Alfred M. Wolin

Special Counsel

Florham Park

T 973-645-4816

Alfred M. Wolin specializes in alternative dispute resolution, arbitrating and mediating some of the nation's most complex and contentious disputes.  His expertise is sought by private and public corporations involved in high-stakes business litigation seeking to reach a mutually acceptable resolution in a cooperative and informal manner, rather than through expensive and protracted proceedings.

Judge Wolin is frequently appointed by federal courts as the Special Master in class action and mass tort litigation, most recently serving as Special Master in Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc., et al., D.N.J. Index No. 04-cv-02819 (SRC), a class action alleging violations of both federal and state antitrust, consumer protection and deceptive trade practices laws.   Notably, Judge Wolin's Opinion & Recommendation, written for lead class counsel in the matter of In re Tyco Securities Litigation in regard to counsel fees in a $3.2 billion settlement, was joined in by Hon. Abner Mikva (USCA ret) and subsequently adopted by the Court.  Judge Wolin was also appointed by the Hon. Faith Hochberg as the Special Discovery Master in Wachtel v. Guardian Life/McCoy v. Health Net and as the Special Master to allocate fees in Transweb, LLC v. 3M.  Judge Wolin also served as an expert witness in Daiichi Sankyo v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb, a patent dispute venued in Paris, France.

In addition to conducting mediations and arbitrations, Judge Wolin is the sole Trustee for ACandS, Artra, Burns & Roe, Congoleum, Leslie Controls 524g asbestos trusts and a co-Trustee of the ASARCO and T.H. Agriculture and Nutrition asbestos trusts.  Judge Wolin has participated in focus groups at the request of counsel preparing substantial matters for trial and has provided expertise in matters involving corporate waste investigations, patent and insurance litigation and corporate governance issues.

Judge Wolin has earned a national reputation in handling substantial and precedent setting cases, and has participated in workshops and seminars on a wide-range of legal subjects.

Prior to joining Saiber, Judge Wolin ran a successful private practice in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and served for 25 years on the Bench of both state and federal courts, including the Union County District Court, the Superior Court of New Jersey and the United States District Court. Throughout his distinguished judicial career, Judge Wolin authored in excess of 300 published opinions and 2000 unpublished opinions that are available on WESTLAW™ and LEXIS™.

William J. Brennan, Jr. Award, presented by the Association of the Federal Bar of the State of New Jersey, 2002

Distinguished Alumni Award, presented by the Rutgers Law School Alumni Association, 1996

Listed In:

  • Best Lawyers® - Arbitration 2019-2020
Best Lawyers Award Badge
Selection methodology for awards and honors can be found here.

No aspect of these advertisements have been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Adjunct Professor, Seton Hall Law School

New Jersey State Bar Association

American Bar Association

Fellow, American Bar Foundation

Master, American Inns of Court

American Judicature Society

Numerous State and Federal Judicial Committee Appointments

Secretary, President, Union County Bar Association, 1976

Municipal prosecutor, Town of Westfield, New Jersey, 1973-1974

Congressional field representative, New Jersey 12th Congressional District, 1972-1979 - Hon. Matthew J. Rinaldo

Special assistant prosecutor, Union County, New Jersey, 1970

Secretary, Union County Ethics Committee, 1970-1978

Legislative aide, U.S. Rep. Matthew Rinaldo, 1970-1978

Chief staff attorney, Union County Legal Aid Society, 1965-1974

Attorney, Roselle Board of Adjustment, 1965-1974

U.S. Army, 1954-1956

“In my spare time, I enjoy gardening and golf.” 

  • In re Prudential Insurance Company: $4,000,000,000 class action alleging improper sales tactics

  • Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co. (environmental)

  • Honeywell v. Minolta: patent infringement case involving patents on auto-focus cameras

  • In re Tri-State Mercedes Benz Dealers (anti-trust)

  • U.S. v. Barr Laboratories: decision caused Barr to reexamine and modify its policies on blend uniformity and sampling techniques